[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for new RDDLnatures and purpose
- From: John Cowan <email@example.com>
- To: Jonathan Borden <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:36:33 -0500
Jonathan Borden wrote:
> should the nature be the URI of its specification?
> -- http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/
That would represent HTML 4.0, any DTD.
> or should the nature be the well-known URI of its content-type: text/html
> -- http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/text/html
That would represent HTML generically, any version.
> or should the nature be something from the DOCTYPE e.g. strict.dtd?
> -- http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd
That would represent HTML 4.0 Strict.
There is / one art || John Cowan <email@example.com>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein