[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for newRDDLnatures and purpose
- From: Jonathan Borden <email@example.com>
- To: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:07:17 -0500
John Cowan wrote:
> > -- http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/
> > -- http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/text/html
> That would represent HTML generically, any version.
> > -- http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd
> That would represent HTML 4.0 Strict.
This analysis is right on. Does this demonstrate a hierarchy of natures
similar to a type hierarchy? Such a hierarchy of natures is distinct from a
classic type hierarchy as it cuts across types incorporating content-types,
document types and (perhaps in another example schema types).
Yet this heirarchy is not obvious from examining the URIs themselves and so
we need a way to express its definition.
Perhaps in english as:
resources which have a nature of http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/ are defined to
inherit the nature of
and perhaps in RDDL as:
><p>Resources which have a specific nature of HTML 4.0 i.e.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/ have a more general nature of text/html i.e.