[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: New W3C XML Schema facet ? [was: RDDL Schematron Schema]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: Jonathan Borden <firstname.lastname@example.org>,Eric van der Vlist <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:31:49 -0600
I don't disagree on principle. I do inquire as to
when it is a good idea to make the schema handling
more complex for all applications vs handling
constraints in script for given applications?
XML Schema is already complex and I'm leary of
more cool features. What are the trade-offs?
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
I agree. One of the very very cool things about XML Schema is the use of
Regular Expression patterns to define datatypes. Adding Schematron/XPath
type assertions would make XML Schema's complexity well worth it (IMHO).