[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>,"'firstname.lastname@example.org'" <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:45:53 -0600
The definitions may need expansion as well, or deeper study
on my part. I note that an agency or agent is a human or
organization. Given what we are on about, it can be
software. I would classify that in terms of delegated authority.
Intergraph Public Safety
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Arnold, Curt [mailto:Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out
because of grammars?)
Any hint on how to provide feedback? For example, the BSR schema attempts
to use illegal names such as "2.310" and "2.310.330.656" for element and
type names and a lot of the type attributes on
element definitions do not have an explicit namespace prefix resulting in
trying to find a "656" type in the schema for schemas, for example.
Doesn't seem quite ready for primetime.