[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SVG & XPointer - When I write SVG code can I be sued?
- From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:00:14 -0500 (EST)
In a message dated 18/01/01 16:50:31 GMT Standard Time, firstname.lastname@example.org
> At 11:28 18/01/2001 -0500, AndrewWatt2000@aol.com wrote:
> >The W3C XPointer specification acknowledges the validity of a Sun patent.
> >Whether or not that is correctly acknowledged is a side issue at present.
> >a consequence when anyone either "downloads" or "implements" XPointer ...
> >we must when creating SVG ... we "agree" to provide Sun with our code no
> >later than the time we make that code available to anyone else.
> implement XPointer != use Xpointer.
> -- robin b.
If only it were that straightforward.
Here is a definition from the "Terms and Conditions" ...<quote>"Modification"
shall mean programming code, including interfaces, developed by or for You
for use in an implementation of the syntax of the Xpointer Specification ....
SVG is programming code which implements the syntax of the XPointer
specification, or more precisely a subset of it. Are you suggesting that SVG
is anything other than "programming code"?
Perhaps Sun drew the boundaries wide to provide reassurance with a broad
reach. That is for them to say.
But the terminology used in the "Terms and Conditions" document seems to
extend way beyond the precise items for which Sun's patent applies.
Just my non-lawyer's $0.02.
I hope we get a clear, unequivocal response from Sun that there is no problem.