[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- To: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:15:21 +0000 (GMT)
Further bulletin from the front: this doesn't mean you can't use a
validating parser as the first stage of an XML Schema-aware processor,
or that you will of necessity be beset by error messages from it if
you do and only use the DOCTYPE statement to define internal general
entities: The XML Infoset draft spec. [1], on which the XML Schema
draft spec. [2] depends in this regard, makes clear that a
well-formed-but-invalid XML document has a perfectly good infoset.
(XML 1.0 DTD-based) validation itself, i.e. XML 1.0 DTD-based
processing beyond that which is required of non-validating processors)
of documents with no external subset affects nothing which XML
Schema-aware processing is sensitive to.
I think maybe it's Friday here as well, but I lost the thread of that
paragrah, so maybe the point below is irrelevant, but anyway...
If the XML uses entity references then there has to be a <!DOCTYPE else
it's not well formed, no? So to use a validating parser as the first
stage of schema processing you must have a full DTD referenced in the
DOCTYPE surely.
In other words, although a "well-formed-but-invalid XML document has a
perfectly good infoset" you can't necessarily get at that infoset using
a validating parser (as such a beast has the right to die on you).
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
- References:
- Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
- From: Dan Vint <dvint@slip.net>
- Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
- From: Caroline Clewlow <cclewlow@eris.dera.gov.uk>
- Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
- From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
- Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
- From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
- Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
- From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
- Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)