[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: DTD and Illegal Construct
- From: "Dudley, Mark" <Mark.Dudley@usa.xerox.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:35:14 -0500
It is an ambiguous content model. You may want to try:
<!ELEMENT Request (A?, B, C?, D?)>
But that might not be what you want.
Mark Dudley
Xerox, Corp.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Vint [mailto:dvint@slip.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 4:14 PM
To: Jim.Shain@alltel.com
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
This is an ambiguous content model. The parser (by design in SGML/XML) isn't
supposed to try and figure out which of the two models are being built
if you have element A or B or C in this case, all three will cause the same
problem.
..dan
>
> I wanted to run this past some knowledgeable people. Is the following a
legal
> or illegal construct for an element in a DTD?
>
> <!ELEMENT Request ((A, B, C?) | (A?, B, C?, D))>
>
> Some have stated that it is illegal because "When A is present it isn't
possible
> to determine whether or not D is required."
>
> Jim Shain
> Sr. C/S Architect
> ALLTEL Information Services
>