[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0 <offtopic>
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Jeff Rafter <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:16:54 -0600
No doubt they smell money. But the problem
is still noisy systems and what happens
when any choice comes down to a difference
of a few voters. Reliability and granularity.
Information systems at their best and worst.
Like the web and the economy: you can distribute faster,
but you can't change the rules of distribution.
They can improve the count by degrees. A close
count comes down to a control. The election.com
processes may make it worse. Now election
officials inspect switch states and count bytes
instead of chads.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Jeff Rafter [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Interesting looks like we will actually put the "all the money and power"
issue to question this time.  It's funny though, Sun isn't joining in
on this one despite it's involvement in tracking California's election this