[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Textual transmission typically faster?
- From: Mark.Papiani@ubsw.com
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:08:46 +0000
Hi,
I just read p.19 of Brett McLaughin's book, Java and XML (O'Reilly),
and was a little surprised by the statement:
"Although some binary data formats can be transmitted very efficiently,
textual transmissions will typically average out as a faster means of
communication".
Could anyone expand on this statement for me, and perhaps supply
references to any papers/benchmarks that show some results?
I have read Several articles discussing XML/HTTP as a distributed
computing protocol and these often list the pros/cons of XML/HTTP
versus CORBA/RMI (or raw socket) based communications (or discuss how
these can be combined with XML).
An often quoted disadvantage of XML/HTTP is that it will be less
efficient than a binary protocol. It seems intuitive that compressed
formats would exhibit better network performance than textual
transmission. But perhaps this depends on the size of the chunks of
data to be transferred and the processing necessary to encode/decode
the data?
Thanks,
---
Dr Mark Papiani
Email: mark.papiani@ubsw.com
Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.