[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Plan B+1 = Plan C+1
- From: "Sean B. Palmer" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Jonathan Borden <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 21:36:34 +0000
Remembering that my proposal is a melding of Jonathan and Tim's, I have
updated it to use a resource element instead of div:-
I believe that the semantics of <link> are too well known and used to just
ignore, so we're going to have to keep them, surely (then HTML processors
can be modified). Basically, it's the same proposal, I just changed div to
Jonathan: maybe it would be better if you just made these changes to your
proposal for continuity, but I still don't like the fact that:-
a. You don't use the XHTML namespace
b. You don't use xhtml:type when you could do.
Easily fixable of course!
Very good efforts everyone,
Sean B. Palmer
"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics."
- Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.