[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fighting Software Patents
- From: David Megginson <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 20:29:20 -0500 (EST)
Tim Bray writes:
> At 05:34 PM 11/01/01 +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > I will just note that exhibiting prior art is not sufficient.
> >You also need some legal action to take place before getting a
> >patent removed, right ? (I would be soooo happy if I was wrong !)
> If the patent holder chooses to defend it, typical legal costs to
> get one stricken down are about a million dollars. -Tim
Just so. If I were doing my own startup, I might need to reserve at
least USD 1M in cash or credit to fight the inevitable nuisance
patents from the US, even though I live in a country that has not
(yet) been bullied into recognizing software patents itself.
I put a lot of the blame on venture capital firms -- they have
intellectual property as an automatic checklist item, so people have
to do bogus software patents just to get funding. I very much doubt
that the VCs will look at their current crop of dot.complete-disasters
and reflect on how little the software patents helped them (I don't
think that learning from your mistakes appears on their checklists).
All the best,
David Megginson email@example.com