OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com> writes:

<snip/>, wrt XML Schema

> Elsewhere
> "Although this DTD is non-normative, any XML document which is not valid per
> this DTD, given redefinitions in its internal subset of the 'p' and 's'
> parameter entities below appropriate to its namespace declaration of the XML
> Schema namespace, is almost certainly not a valid schema document, with the
> exception of documents with multiple namespace prefixes for the XML Schema
> namespace itself"
> Having just read another round of "DTDs are Dead and 
> Deserve to Be" in an article prominently quoting 
> a W3C official who is in charge of architectures, 
> why is that there?

1) Just what is it that you think is inappropriate about the above?
2) What 'W3C official' and what article?

  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/