[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
- From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:30:52 +0600
My mistake, I was thinking 'obfustication' (now where did I get that..?)
10/10 4 o9n BTW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Robertson [mailto:jamesr@steptwo.com.au]
> Sent: 17 January 2001 12:55
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
>
>
> At 17:16 17/01/2001, Danny Ayers wrote:
> > > > > Damn these shortenings of words. They are
> > > > > causing way too much o9n.
> >
> >Nope, I can't get this one - unless it's meant to be o11n ?
>
> "obfuscation"...
>
> J
>
> -------------------------
> James Robertson
> Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
> SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
> Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution
>
> http://www.steptwo.com.au/
> jamesr@steptwo.com.au
>