Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?

[Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>]

Eric van der Vlist wrote:

> Looks like we are going towards 4 different types of XML "schema"
> languages to define:
>
> - The structure
> - The datatypes
> - The rules
> - The semantic.

This is very interesting - I wonder if we might be heading for another split
such as the one that saw XSL split into T and FO? The differences are
becoming more pronounced, and the term "schema language" is starting to lack
definition as a result.

Eric (or anyone else), how do you differentiate between rules and semantics?



--
Regards,

Marcus Carr                      email:  mrc@allette.com.au
___________________________________________________________________
Allette Systems (Australia)      www:    http://www.allette.com.au
___________________________________________________________________
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
       - Einstein