[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
- From: Marcus Carr <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:13:49 +1100
Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> Looks like we are going towards 4 different types of XML "schema"
> languages to define:
> - The structure
> - The datatypes
> - The rules
> - The semantic.
This is very interesting - I wonder if we might be heading for another split
such as the one that saw XSL split into T and FO? The differences are
becoming more pronounced, and the term "schema language" is starting to lack
definition as a result.
Eric (or anyone else), how do you differentiate between rules and semantics?
Marcus Carr email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."