[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: PSVI
- From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 19:29:29 +0000
> At 05:38 PM 01/03/01 +0000, Leigh Dodds wrote:
> > The PSVI is the true Infoset that really meets those 80/20 requirements.
>
> Of course the great risk in this kind of thinking is that you
> start to believe that in general you have to apply a schema
> before you can start to do useful work with a chunk of XML.
Exactly. I've not found a need for data typing in my applications
yet, but then I'm mostly in a document processing environment.
As I said, I don't necessarily agree that with the proposition,
I'd just like this assumption (PSVI == Primary/Core Infoset) documented
if that is the case.
Perhaps its not. And if not, then lets see this stressed somehow (as
Jonathan Borden notes wrt to typing).
Cheers,
L.
--
Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic | sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant | -- William of Ockham
- References:
- PSVI
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>