[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: more grist
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: John Cowan <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 14:13:51 -0600
I see that. The issue was raised of
using it to make XML syntax-independent.
I don't see that although I understand it.
And I am mentioning you prominently
in my prayers tonight along with the
Caucasian lady I saw at Pizza Inn with three
children, two asian girls and one black toddler,
all calling her "mama". God bless those
that take it on themselves to hold
together diversity. Such is the sweet
spot of understanding.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: John Cowan [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 2:09 PM
To: Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Cc: Ben Trafford; email@example.com
Subject: Re: more grist
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> So the InfoSet takes the role of the
> SGML Declaration sort of (not tied
> to a specific syntax)?
The Infoset is a property set, less
comprehensive than the SGML property set.