[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PSVI
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- To: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 18:16:48 -0500
At 10:09 AM 3/7/2001 -0800, Ronald Bourret wrote:
>But what if I want things like attribute defaults or data types but
>don't care about validation? Can I get these?
Heh. You could create XSLT style sheets which added xsi:type attributes or
attribute values all over the place, but that's not likely to be processed
by most parsers in current processing models.
>It would be nice if the PSVI was factored into multiple categories (e.g.
>defaults, type information, validation information) and parsers could
>implement these separately, with applications choosing what they needed.
I'd love to see that, but I'm not holding my breath! A reasonably clear
well-formed XML representation of the PSVI might help with some of it, though.
Simon St.Laurent
Associate Editor
O'Reilly and Associates
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PSVI
- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- References:
- Re: PSVI
- From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
- Re: PSVI
- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>