[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PSVI
- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>,Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 18:55:21 -0500
Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> At 10:09 AM 3/7/2001 -0800, Ronald Bourret wrote:
>
> >It would be nice if the PSVI was factored into multiple categories (e.g.
> >defaults, type information, validation information) and parsers could
> >implement these separately, with applications choosing what they needed.
>
> I'd love to see that, but I'm not holding my breath! A reasonably clear
> well-formed XML representation of the PSVI might help with some of it,
though.
>
>
to be fair Richard Tobin's XML Schema for the Infoset at:
http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~richard/infoset/20010216/
includes a PSVI module:
http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~richard/infoset/20010216/XMLSchema-infoset.xsd
Doesn't this represent a well-formed XML representation of the PSVI?
-Jonathan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PSVI
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- References:
- Re: PSVI
- From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
- Re: PSVI
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>