[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI.
- From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@mediaone.net>
- To: "Biron,Paul V" <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 23:43:18 -0500
This is because schema elements (type, element, attribute, etc.) belong to the "XMLSchema" namespace, except built-in types, which also belong to "XMLSchema-datatypes"? Which URI should be used in values of xsi:type that refer to built in types (even if no schema is in use at all)? I suppose either one would be OK.
At 07:33 AM 3/8/01 -0800, you wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: KAZUMI Saito [SMTP:ksaito@jp.fujitsu.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 7:49 PM
>> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
>> Subject: XML Schema built-in data type namespace URI.
>>
>> The built-in datatypes defined by XML Schema part2 has namespace URI
>> (see 3.1 Namespace considerations in XML Schema part2):
>>
>> * http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema-datatypes
>>
>See below.
>
>> To declear the element which has the built-in datatype, which is correct?
>>
>> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema">
>> <xsd:element name="comment" type="xsd:string"/>
>>
>This is the correct way.
>> ...
>>
>> or
>>
>> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema"
>>
>> xmlns:xsdatatype="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema-datatypes">
>> <xsd:element name="comment" type="xsdatatype:string"/>
>>
>This is not correct.
>
>Because the built-in datatypes are intended to be used both by the schema language and by other specifications, it was decided that
>there should be two namespaces. The XML Schema namespace
>(http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema) is to be used to identify
>a built-in datatype whenever that type is being used IN THE
>CONTEXT of an XML Schema; the XML Schema Datatypes namespace
>(http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema-datatypes) is to be used to indentify a schema datatype whenver that type is being used
>OUTSIDE THE CONTEXT of an XML Schema.
>
>I hope this helps.
>
>pvb
take it easy,
Charles Reitzel