[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>,Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@schemantix.com>,"'W. E. Perry'" <wperry@fiduciary.com>, XML DEV <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:53:14 -0600
`The question is,' said UserAgent, `which is to be master -- that's all.' "
That is why web services are "discoverable". If you can find its
schema, you can know if it is likely to fall *before* you do business
with it. You can't tell it to uncross its legs; you can move and
avoid the yolk.
Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]
Sure, it gets ridiculous. But unless you have a pre-existing relationship
with the recipient, or are the recipient yourself, why do you automatically
expect them to share your reading of what's important?