[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Relative Namespaces
- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- To: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>,"Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>, Charles Reitzel <creitzel@mediaone.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:21:21 +0000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>; "Charles Reitzel"
<creitzel@mediaone.net>
Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: Relative Namespaces
<SNIP>
> Also to clarify-- is Tim saying that the following is pointless because it
> equates to a prefixed name being treated as a non namespace name or is he
> saying that the document is in error wrt to namespaces because the prefix
> can not logically be resolved?
>
> <foo:bar xmlns:foo="http://foo.com">
> <foo:baz xmlns:foo=""/>
> </foo:bar>
The document is in error and most ( but not all :-) ) XML parsers would
throw an error of some kind.
Martin Gudgin
DevelopMentor