[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Richard Tobin <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:37:39 -0600
So now the guy can go to lunch during the
downtime and almost make it back.
The trick is failover. The problem of
attacking an unrealistic requirement
with a simple solution is cost: what
solution makes it realistic. Like many
out of the box solutions, you have
to redefine the requirement. No one
system typically leaves you with one free
lunch. Two might.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: John Cowan [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Richard Tobin scripsit:
> 0.01% of a year is 3,000 seconds, not 30.
Oops. Musta misread the % sign or something.
Ignore previous flames.
Unless somebody promises you 99.9999% reliability, in which case beware.