[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: What can be changed, and what cannot? (was: Re: Request for a poll)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Rick Jelliffe <email@example.com>,Michael Champion <firstname.lastname@example.org>,xml-dev <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:42:45 -0600
To be fair, there were a number of comments about it
getting too complex. Even Paul Grosso posted an email
mentioning that it was beyond a DTD plus more datatypes.
The response was the primer which did help some (me
included) understand the thing.
You are right. The time for that debate is past. The future
is in the PSVI and the new recommendations. Not surprisingly,
that seemed to me to be what Henry was saying in his slides
from his presentation. Some may differ with what he has
in mind, or others, but that is exactly the debate that
should be held now. Schemas are a done deal.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
From: Michael Champion <email@example.com>
>What can be changed,
The use of PSVI in new recommendations. X* 1.1 and X* 2.0.
> what cannot, and
XML Schemas 1.0, because it has finished Last Call and all the reviews.