[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ER schema language (was Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy))
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Rick Jelliffe <email@example.com>, xml-dev <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:57:11 -0600
Hmm. Interesting, Rick. I'd like to drag this
idea over to the HumanML list and see what
they say. The problem of object model
and language binding is emerging over there
as it usually does whenever multiple
applications are built that use the same
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 11:08 AM
Subject: ER schema language (was Re: Request for a poll: (was RE:
Datatypes vs anarchy))
From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>So what you are suggesting looks right,
Probably I should be a bit more concrete. I attach a little draft of a spec
for an ER schema language, showing the kind of thing I would be thinking of.
(The thing missing is the construction of built-in valueSets to act as
datatypes.) Just a rough sketch.