[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Web Philosophy
- From: Ann Navarro <email@example.com>
- To: "Martin v. Loewis" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,email@example.com
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:48:46 -0500
At 01:45 AM 3/27/01, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> > As a result, I remain a vocal critic of W3C process and of many of its
> > results - making noise may irritate people, but staying silent only (IMHO)
> > makes things worse.
>There is, of course, another alternative: For those results that you
>are interested in, participate in the process of defining the
But Martin, that's not nearly as much fun as being the public curmudgeon ;)
I actually find it quite sad that a few people that would be of value to
the process refuse to participate even on an invited expert level because
they wouldn't accept the confidentiality constraints of participation. A
loss to both sides, I believe.
Chief Geek, WebGeek Inc.
Now in print! XHTML By Example
What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/