[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: more namespace abuse
- From: Wayne Steele <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:38:22 -0800
That's pretty funny.
I can understand what they're trying to do, and why.
But I wish they hadn't "based" this proprietary HTML namespacing mechanism
on XML namespaces, which already have enough confusion around them.
IIRC, IE 5 had an PI approach to declaring these HTML 'namespaces'.
Did someone decide using an XMLNS attribute was better?
>From: "Simon St.Laurent" <email@example.com>
>Subject: more namespace abuse
>Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:01:44 -0500
>I don't even really know how to talk about it:
>Wow. Wow. That's really weird.
>Simon St.Laurent - Associate Editor, O'Reilly and Associates
>XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
>XHTML: Migrating Toward XML
>http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com