[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wasting half a trillion dollars?
- From: Anatole Tartakovsky <email@example.com>
- To: Al Snell <firstname.lastname@example.org>,"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 01:20:26 -0400
I agree that for real world back-office type database enabled applications
"fat client" beats "server-only" hands down. However, I would not discount
browser as "the best business application platform". Late versions of IE
(i.e. 5.5+) CAN be effectively used for "fat client" types of applications.
Few things often overlooked by "cross platform/browser" developers:
1. IE5.5+ supports behaviors/custom controls that allow complete
2. XML support is world-class, with shared code model allowing
from presentation and high performance model/view controllers.
3. Support for business functions such as customizable print and print
preview and "user settings"
4. Customizable HTTPRequest and WebServices allowing true distributed
5. Direct integration of business applications (including Excel and
Macromedia) via XML
As a matter of fact, in the last few years we were actively converting
existing client-server applications into the browser based model. We ended
up with automated conversion process (via XML of course) that was producing
while providing identical look-and-feel, functionality and API for the
developers. Following are the links to the articles in XML Journal,
PowerBuilder Journal and XML DevCon 2001 presentations on the subject:
supports object inheritance, implementation of interfaces, precompiled
distribution and shared run-time with C#, VB and C++. Given the "average
chances for "language of choice" for business apps than the Java and/or C#.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Al Snell" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
Cc: "W. E. Perry" <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "XML DEV" <email@example.com>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 11:00 PM
Subject: RE: Wasting half a trillion dollars?
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> > People who tell you a web browser is a perfect
> > next generation client need to write a few
> > industrial sized database applications so
> > they can discover the joys of persistent state
> > and client side business rules.
> Aye to that. I hear you, brother!
> I've developed all too many Web apps now. And yet I remember a discussion
> about GUI design (not as in, "where do we put the buttons", but more
> "writing X windows or MacOS") in which somebody fervently proposed that
> the GUI software was just a Web browser that handled overlapping windows
> (eg, it included its own window manager), and then ALL applications were
> Web apps. He had some odd ideas about the demand for word processing and
> spreadsheets, I expect.
> Making all applications emit a Java applet when invoked which runs on the
> GUI client and may talk back to the application proper via RMI is a little
> more like it, methinks...
> form work anything like a decent GUI in most cases. This is hell to work
> > Len
> Alaric B. Snell
> http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ http://www.warhead.org.uk/
> Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: firstname.lastname@example.org