[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ASN.1 and XML
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: "Al B. Snell" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,The Deviants <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:37:32 -0500
XML has acceptance. They call that "a willing audience".
However you get it, it is the difference between
success and also-ran. It isn't a technical success.
It doesn't have to be.
<rant>I just posted an XMLHACK response to the "web is
boring" article. Sure it is. Geeks run it.
Geeks are almost the world's most boring mammals
second only to standardsWonks. You want to
make it less boring? Pick any tool that works.
But first, you must learn what moves the human
heart and to do that, you can't be scared of your
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Al B. Snell [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
On 24 May 2001, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> You've been making claims that ASN.1 is competition for XML. I'd like
> to see some backing for those claims.
The only edge XML has over ASN.1 encodings is that XML has hype,