[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Steve Tinney <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 10:55:34 -0500
I have before. We are staring into UML, RDF, Topic Maps,
XML Schemas, now add RDDL, TREX, RELAX, etc. It isn't that any tool
or method alone is hard to grasp, it is the relationships
among them and how to choose when one is best. In other
words, if we dare to do less, we should use less maybe.
But put it altogether and I think interoperability becomes
a statistical guess. Too many casually aligned parts.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Steve Tinney [mailto:email@example.com]
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 11:15 am, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
Could you elaborate?