[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-sc hema)
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 14:05:25 -0700
At 11:31 AM 30/05/01 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>RDDL is a pack o' XLinks. It's a good idea and well done
>but not a core piece.
Hmm. *If* RDDL takes off, its role is going to be pretty
damn central. Since the design of XML empirically has a
bias in favor of using multiple related resources to do
one job for a class of data objects, whatever's used to
tie them together is important.
>It is an application language that
>one may adopt to align pieces just as one might learn
>Topic Maps. But learn XLinks first and then RDDL/Topic Maps.
Huh? Try again, I fail to parse this. -Tim