[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
- From: Gary Stephenson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:26:36 +1000
Thanks for the updated info.
> >Canonical output mismatch between sun/valid/not-sa02.xml and
> >Canonical output mismatch between sun/valid/sa02.xml and
> There has been some confusion about the validity of tokens separated
> by character references to whitespace (which depends on the
> definitions of Names and Nmtokens).
In looking at the sun/valid/not-sa02.xml file, I can't find any tokens that
that are separated _only_ by character references to whitespace. The most
likely offender would appear to be:
nmtokens = " this
also gets  normalized "
but there are literal spaces following the character references in each case.
So it would appear I am not understanding the issue properly. Would you mind
explaining in a little more detail for those of us that came in late... <g>
why these documents are not in fact well-formed (or should that actually be
not valid as you stated)?