[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: XML 1.0 is simple. was: RE: almost four years ago....
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:13:59 -0500
Core - XML 1.0 (well-formed and DTD validation)
o Aggregation - XML 1.0 + Namespaces
o Modeling - XML 1.0 + Namespaces + XML Schemas
o System - XML application languages such as RDDL
Intergraph Public Safety
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Not a better, but the same with a shift...
Maybe we should change the name for "Smaller XML" if people won't change
the name for "Greater XML" and just call our downtown XML "core XML" ?
Now, the next problem is what would be "core XML" ?
Would it be XML 1.0, XML 1.0 + namespaces, XML 1.0 + namespaces + W3C
XML Schema, ...
My personal feeling would be that it should be XML 1.0 + namespaces but
I don't think it will make an unanimity!