[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Newbie
- From: Bob DuCharme <bob@udico.com>
- To: xml-dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:58:39 -0400
>My principle in adopting terms from other languages has always
> been to stick as close to the original
>use as possible. It's a token of repsect, if nothing else.
>Besides, schemas is simply _wrong_.
I wholeheartedly agree with the first statement, despite the second
statement's contradiction of it. The "original use" is
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/.
The first draft of the Schema spec actually used both forms. The WG made
their choice (I'll even take partial credit for them choosing "schemas"--see
my May 1999 comments on the first Working Draft at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/1999AprJun/0038.
html and search for "schemas") and they moved on, knowing that consistent
usage makes a document more professional (from an editorial point of view)
and easier to understand.
Bob DuCharme www.snee.com/bob <bob@
snee.com> see http://www.snee.com/bob/xsltquickly for
info on new book "XSLT Quickly" from Manning Publications.
- References:
- RE: Newbie
- From: "Boyse, Jim" <Jim_Boyse@foremost.com>
- RE: Newbie
- From: Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie>
- RE: Newbie
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>