[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: XML DOM
- From: Steven Noels <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 23:15:58 +0200
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: dinsdag 3 juli 2001 23:01
> To: 'Steven Noels'
> Cc: Xml-Dev (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: XML DOM
> Yep, I understand DOM is an interface spec.
> I own an MS-published book (that for reasons of potential culpability will
> remain nameless), that, on page 227, has a diagram labeled "The
> between the W3C DOM object interfaces", with interfaces such as
> "IXMLDOMNode" and "IXMLDOMDocument" shown. These look like COM interfaces,
> so I expect it is an error to blame W3C for this.
Whether W3C should be blamed for DOM or not, is another discussion :-)
But IXMLDOMNode et al. is definitely MS-speak.