[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
- From: Tim Bray <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Joel Rees <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 11:16:31 -0700
At 11:43 PM 24/07/01 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>> . . . just *declaring* Blueberry -- and not
>> using any new feature, that older tools won't be able to handle it?
>A parser designed for XML 1.0 will do one of several things:
It depends how Blueberry is signaled. If they change the
XML declaration to say
<?xml version="1.0.1" ?>
or some such, then the processor has wiggle room. I have no
idea what the installed base of processors do in this case.
On the other hand, if they do something like
<?xml version="1.0" unicode="3.1.1" ?>
Then every XML processor in the world will correctly reject it.
Of course this second option is not viable if the W3C misguidedly
lets NEL into the S production. I must say it feels like a
really clean use-unicode-by-reference approach. -Tim