[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ANN: SAX Filters for Namespace Processing
- From: Julian Reschke <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <email@example.com>,Simon Fell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:15:05 +0200
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 4:49 AM
> To: Simon Fell
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: ANN: SAX Filters for Namespace Processing
> On 30 Jul 2001 19:18:28 -0700, Simon Fell wrote:
> > As the two fragments you give are not equivalent, I'm a little
> > confused as to why you'd want to do this ?
> >From my perspective, they're not equivalent. From another perspective,
> they are equivalent. See:
> I'm basically attempting to build a bridge from a practice I don't like
> to a practice I do like.
I would be careful with that: in general (and according to the Infoset) both
notations "mean" different things. Yes, there are XML languages where both
might be equivalent (in particular the case of non-prefixed attributes), but
you shouldn't take that as the general case!