[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SAX2 bugs -- please file!
- From: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Nicolas LEHUEN <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 13:55:34 -0400
Nicolas LEHUEN wrote:
> The question may be completely out of scope here, and I'm readying myself
> for a flame mail flood, but how come such a standard end being hosted on
> SourceForge ?
Because it is a neutral location.
> What is the relationship with the version on David Meggison's site
> (http://www.megginson.com/SAX/Java/index.html) ?
David is turning over SAX to the community.
> Maybe the root question is : why is SAX under the org.xml.sax package,
> whereas DOM is in the org.w3c.dom ? Why isn't SAX hosted on the W3C site ?
> Is there an historical / legal / other reason for this ?
SAX is not a W3C product.
There is / one art || John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein