[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: SAX2 bugs -- please file!
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@ubicco.com>,"'xml-dev@lists.xml.org'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>,"'sax-devel@lists.sourceforge.net'" <sax-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,"'sax-users@lists.sourceforge.net'" <sax-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:55:37 -0500
Because SAX was developed under Megginson's mentoring by
XML-Dev members, not the W3C. SAX is not a standard. It is a
good idea done by those who needed it done quickly and
precisely.
Now the question is where it should be kept for sustainment
and future development. Apparently, those who care enough
to take change picked SourceForge.
Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolas LEHUEN [mailto:nicolas.lehuen@ubicco.com]
The question may be completely out of scope here, and I'm readying myself
for a flame mail flood, but how come such a standard end being hosted on
SourceForge ?