[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SAX Filters for Namespace Processing
- From: Paul Tchistopolskii <email@example.com>
- To: Jonathan Borden <firstname.lastname@example.org>,Tom Bradford <email@example.com>,Ronald Bourret <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 12:10:05 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan Borden <email@example.com>
> For example: XSLT. Hard to use it without using namespaces, eh?
Maybe I don't understand you, but I think the answer is:
"No, it is trivial."
For example, one may write xsl:value-of as xsl-value-of
( Not to mention that XSLScript has no 'namespaces' at all ).
I know, I know, this makes xsl:namespace-alias a bit more
complex, but I'd not care about that subtile complexity,
because xsl:namespace-alias itlsef is not a solution,
but a problem.
PS. I think, letting namespaces and DTDs into XML 1.0 was
a mistake. I think, namespaces will kill XML, because they're
not a solution, but a problem.
PPS. The last but not the least. I don't understand, why people keep
saying that XML is a strict subset of SGML.
SGML has no namespaces, right ?