[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CORBA vs. XML (was: Re: XML.COM: How I Learned to Love daBomb)
- From: Ruslan Shevchenko <Ruslan@Shevchenko.Kiev.UA>
- To: Brendan Macmillan <bren@mail.csse.monash.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 19:17:24 +0300
Brendan Macmillan wrote:
>
> Hi Ruslan,
>
> Thanks for the pointer to comp.object.corba
>
> I think the statement in there that
> SOAP/XML-RPC is about data, and
> CORBA is about objects (plus infrastructure: naming service etc)
> sounds pretty accurate.
>
SOAP is not data.
May be next :
XML-RPC and SOAP about XML-based encoding
CORBA IIOP about CORBA-based encoding.
............
> >
> > // Whay this have sence from technical point of view, you can
> > // read in our ISTA-2001 article:
> >
> > http://www.gradsoft.com.ua/eng/whitepapers/ISTA2001/ISTA2001-final.htm
> But no XML in there...
>
It's about passing via web: i. e. the statement is that for LAN and
WAN we need different graining: LAN is CORBA, WAN is XML or HTML
which do not matter in this context.
By other words:
Fine grained object models: local machine
// objecl languagess, COM
Coarse grained object models: LAN
// CORBA, DCOM
Gigantic grained object models: WAN
// SOAP, XML-RPC
--
Ruslan Shevchenko
GradSoft: Chief Software Architect
http://www.gradsoft.com.ua/eng/