[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: An open plea to the W3C (was Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validation)
- From: Rick Jelliffe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:44:35 +1000
From: "Sean McGrath" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Do it as an experiment. Do it as a controlled fork. If it does not yield
> benefits, scrap it.
> Dare to do less. That is what made the web so great in the first place.
> Do it before vested interests grab the initiative.
> Do it before it is too late.
I sympathize with this view (indeed, I called for a refactoring of XML
to get rid of the valid/well-formed split in favour of a DTD-less/DTDed
split last year.)
But I don't think it is in the W3C's so-called architecture: instead we
have the split between status quo XML and PSVI XML. I suspect that
many there expect that the DTDed XML will wither on the vine with the advent
of XML Schemas, and that in a few years time we can all switch to
a headlessXML versus PSVI XML dichotomy without difficulty.
If we get too caught up in superficial syntax debates, we will miss the
core decision that has architectural ramifications: the advent of
PSVI-based specifications which require buying into XML Schemas:
More importantly, the W3C responds to its members needs and priorities.
I think most of them are concerned about the upper layers, not reform
of the foundation.