[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
- From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <email@example.com>
- To: 'Peter Piatko' <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:11:13 -0700
Are you asking me or Tim? I started the Formal Description activity
(formerly known as MSL) and created NUNs as they are in that document
(although others had talked about creating such a naming convention). So
yes, my thoughts are in the same general vicinity.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Piatko [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:34 PM
> To: Fuchs, Matthew; 'Tim Bray'; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: "'Tim Bray'" <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:11 PM
> Subject: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
> > Likewise, one can consider the creation of a complexType as likewise
> > creating a namespace (or asserting the existence of a
> namespace) whose
> > is the concatenation of the enclosing namespace and the
> local name of the
> > complexType (exact syntax open to discussion) and all
> elements declared
> > immediately within it are in that namespace.
> After finally glancing at the XML Schema: Formal Description
> document I
> noticed that NUN's (as you call them) are at least the
> beginnings of this
> idea. Are your thoughts in the same general vicinity?