Re: infinite depth to namespaces

[Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>]

 From: "Michael Brennan" <Michael_Brennan@allegis.com>
 
> I think it is a good thing so long as we accept that it is ill-suited to
> some needs, it is not the only viable schema language, and the views of the
> schema author should not dictate the processing model of every consuming
> application 

A difficulty is that one cannot know if an XML schema provides required
information for our documents (in particular, default values) without
actually downloading it.   This is the same problem that the "standalone"
declaration was aimed at, I suppose.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe