[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Sun and independent developers
- From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- To: Kurt Cagle <kurt@kurtcagle.net>, paulo.gaspar@krankikom.de,xml-rpc@yahoogroups.com, soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com,decentralization@yahoogroups.com, xml-dev@lists.xml.org, xml-dist-app@w3.org,Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 14:06:11 -0700
>Actually, I think there's a pretty standard general usage.
>XML RPC is a generic term that is used to describe any XML based remote
>procedure call language, and could just as easily subsume SOAP, for
Just out of curiosity, is that really true in others experience? I have
personally heard people talk about "XML-based RPC" or "XML Procedure
Calls" and many other variations. I do not believe that I have *ever*
heard or seen anyone use "XML RPC" to mean "XML-based RPC" (other than
in the context of this particular discussion). I would be interested in
evidence that this is really such a standard general usage as opposed to
something like "XML-based RPC".