RE: I need a name

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

Universal name would be harder.  Augmented name would 
sound like an Englebartism.  Enhanced name sounds like a 
stereo processor.  None of these is more or less indicative 
of what it does AFAICT than what is there.

IMO, they are the same topic:  churning to get it perfect 
for any case real or imagined over keeping it stable 
to allow products to ship.  If this were a catastrophe 
making quality defect, I might think it important.

I guess I should backtrack and see if the question 
is more one of explanation over inventing a new 
name for the spec or adding to the ever expanding 
acronymy given an overburdened technology but it's 
Friday and I have to go mow the lawn before the 
rain comes back.  The neighbors are eyeing me. :-)

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:jlowery@scenicsoft.com]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@ingr.com]
>...
> I don't have a problem with that.

It's not a problem until you have to explain the two at the same time to
somebody.

> 
> I have a problem with specs that keep 
> churning on the basics and never settle 
> down long enough for the tool vendors 
> to get the tools stable enough for 
> the rest of us to make money.   Internet 
> time is a myth.  Internet business failure is not.

I think that's a different topic, no?