[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance"
- From: Seairth Jacobs <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: xml-dev <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 17:28:16 -0400
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> It is still *useful* in that it is a well-formed construction
> independent of position in the tree or location in a document
> or namespace. That is of limited use but real. It might
> require extra-XML knowledge for example, but spiders that
> troll the net doing indexing might only care about meta tags
> (again, limited but possible).
This makes sense to me.
> So cases exist for which simply knowing <a href="stuff" >
> is useful. Context is usually important but the
> rule as stated is too narrow.
Okay. What is missing or how exactly is it too narrow? Give me your
version of the statement that would satisfy your understanding.