RE: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance"

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

They have a range of frequency of occurrence in 
which the semantic is the same.  A global definition 
may exist but empirically, is not required.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Seairth Jacobs [mailto:seairth@seairth.com]

So these types of elements have a sort of "globally implied" definition that
is independent of a specific doctype?   If the above statement were to be
extended to include these "global" elements within a given domain, would the
statement be complete?  I gotta go think about this a bit...