[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance"
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Seairth Jacobs <email@example.com>,"DuCharme, Bob (LNG)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,xml-dev <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 16:26:11 -0500
They have a range of frequency of occurrence in
which the semantic is the same. A global definition
may exist but empirically, is not required.
From: Seairth Jacobs [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
So these types of elements have a sort of "globally implied" definition that
is independent of a specific doctype? If the above statement were to be
extended to include these "global" elements within a given domain, would the
statement be complete? I gotta go think about this a bit...