[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today)
- From: Richard Tobin <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 16:14:43 +0100 (BST)
>So far, *nothing* has changed.
That's not true. The patent policy document says:
we have begun to use portions of the policy in the day-to-day
operations of W3C
But even if that wasn't so, things have certainly changed. Before,
people believed that W3C specs would not be encumbered by
royal-bearing patents; now, they have reason to believe that they may
>Why should this be different all of a sudden?
>Can we keep the patent lawyers out the door for
>a moment and go back to technology, please?
You seem to mean "please go on working as if you knew that the W3C
will reject royalty-bearing-patent-encumbered specs, when in fact
there is good reason to believe that it won't". In fact, the patent
issue affects whether many people will want to work on a project.
If that's "esoteric", I guess you have have to put up with esotericism.