[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[xml-dev] Re: CATALOGs versus RDDL
- From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 15:44:24 +1000
From: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>
> I wouldn't expect to find a RDDL by following an
> xsi:schemaLocation, I'd expect to find an XSD, n'est-ce pas?
So
1) Use any application-specific over-riding catalog (e.g. a cache)
2) Use any catalog that comes with document
3) Use any document hints (e.g. schema location):
4) Use a RDDL document at namespace URI
5) Use any resource at the namespace URI (if it is the resource you are looking for)
6) Use any built-in default catalog
7) Report to the user or use some default behaviour
Is that more like the policy that users would expect a RDDL- and CATALOG-
aware application to follow?
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe