[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Follow up on: Help regarding an XML attribute.
- From: Wayne Steele <email@example.com>
- To: Huylanp@Oceanwide.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:13:43 -0700
I don't like the looks of your attribute called "dt:dt".
In an XSD, the 'name' attribute of an 'attribute' element must be an NCName.
If you change it to "dt", will it then validate the way you expect?
>From: Huy-Lan Phan <Huylanp@Oceanwide.com>
>Subject: [xml-dev] Follow up on: Help regarding an XML attribute.
>Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:23:06 -0400
>I'd like to thank everyone who answered my question
>regarding an element's attribute, namely Wayne, Ronald,
>Eddie and Vance.
>I tried them and both way suggested worked:
>The simpleContent or complexContent with the restriction element
>or extension element.
>Now I have another dilema. I have defined two attributes and they're
>both required. Somehow, if one if them is defined, the validation will
>go through without giving any error. It only gives error when both
>of them are missing. This is not what I'm looking for since I want
>both of them to be required, so if one of them is missing, I want the
>validation to give an error. I don't know if it's XML Spy's validation
>that is wrong.
>Here is the element defined with two mandatory attributes:
> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:base64Binary">
> <xsd:attribute name="dt:dt"
>type="xsd:string" use="required" default="bin.base64"/>
> <xsd:attribute name="FileName"
>Huy-Lan Phan email@example.com
>Manager, Account Integration
>Oceanwide Marine Network Inc.
>507 Place d'Armes 3rd floor 514-289-9090 ext 239
>Montreal, Quebec, Canada
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp